Experience

We worked on the legal framework for a SaaS product, including its Terms of Service, Data Processing Agreement and Privacy Policy. The work started with data flows, the parties' roles and how customers would use the service. It also covered subprocessors, billing and customer eligibility.

We combined the documentation work with a review of implementation assumptions, identifying parts of the customer journey that needed to reflect the agreed legal terms.

The scope also covered provider switching and data migration under the Data Act, including preparation for further changes to switching charges. The product has not yet launched; the work prepared its legal framework for launch and further development.

We reviewed a SaaS product using repository materials and team reports. We compared the implementation with the earlier assumptions on contract formation, service activation, customer verification and data retention.

We prepared comments on specific implementation points and corresponding documentation changes. The recommendations connected legal requirements with product behaviour.

We reviewed and prepared a master services agreement for a software company providing development services to an enterprise customer. The work covered team delivery and pricing models, scope, acceptance and termination.

We also addressed software IP, data processing, subcontractors, liability and restrictions on recruiting personnel. The agreement was reviewed against how the services would be organised and delivered.

We analysed product materials and a proposed registration process before a planned B2B onboarding launch. We considered how service documentation would connect with commercial terms, document acceptance and authority to represent an organisation.

The work also covered questions about personal data and suppliers that needed answers before the final documentation could be prepared. The work is ongoing; the intended process still requires further decisions and implementation.

We worked on updating a platform’s legal documentation before its planned launch. The scope covered service terms, privacy information, contact channels and vulnerability reporting.

We compared the documents with the current product and planned changes, aligned names and references, reduced duplicated information and prepared a list of questions for the team to close before launch. Product development is ongoing; the platform has not yet launched.

We prepared a draft agreement for transferring software rights to a company. We first identified the components of the product and which should be covered by the document, including future software versions.

We analysed alternative operating models for a digital platform. Starting with user journeys and transaction flows, we mapped the contractual structure, the parties' roles and their responsibilities under each option.

The assessment covered personal data, consumer issues and operational risks. We combined it with a review of the agreement, clearer processes and a plan for successive payment-model iterations.

We worked on a draft agreement for use between platform users. The analysis covered their mutual obligations, responsibility and the distinction between the platform operator and the users entering into an agreement.

The work also addressed how users would complete the document: the necessary information, clear provisions and options reflecting different user situations.

We advised an international technology company on engaging a team member who would work from Poland. We compared direct employment, an employer of record and genuine B2B cooperation against the intended working relationship.

The assessment covered employment and remote work obligations, social security, tax considerations, software IP and the relationship with equity documentation. It provided a basis for selecting a model and adapting the relevant documents.

The agreed model was employment under Polish law, connected with the US equity programme documents. The agreement was signed and the employee started work.

We reviewed a US employer’s document package for a person who would work in Poland on an ongoing basis. We identified terms requiring adaptation in working arrangements, confidentiality, intellectual property and data use.

We distinguished the local employee or contractor relationship from the US company’s corporate and equity documents. The work covered the Polish part of the review and consistency across the package.

We supported a technology startup with its corporate structure and governance arrangements. The work covered founder rights, equity arrangements, management, representation and the allocation of corporate decisions.

We considered beneficial ownership requirements and the clarity needed for future ownership changes and due diligence. The corporate work was connected to the team's product and commercial plans.

We prepared a questionnaire to help founders organise their business arrangements before drafting legal documents. It covered roles, commitment, equity, decision-making and possible departures.

We also addressed how to assess whether each person was fulfilling their responsibilities. We brought together shared positions and differences so the founders could discuss their expectations and decide how to develop the product.

We worked on a draft data protection policy for an organisation where responsibility for processing required distinctions between several roles and activities. We identified which principles could be shared and where separate documentation was needed.

The draft covered authorisations and access, document handling, cooperation with the data protection officer and allocation of responsibilities. It was prepared for further substantive review. The new arrangements have not yet been implemented.

We prepared proposed changes to the terms and Privacy Policy of an MVP platform. We compared the documents with the available user features, contact arrangements and information made visible on the platform.

The changes clarified the operator’s role, data visibility and processing information. Descriptions of features not yet offered also needed to be removed so the documents matched the current product.

We analysed engagement documents involving personal data flows between several parties. We compared provisions across the documents to check that the roles and responsibilities were described consistently.

We prepared proposed changes and their rationale for discussions between the parties. The work included identifying the limits of the client’s responsibility for specific processes and distinguishing changes from issues to confirm with the other parties.

We reviewed procurement records for a funded project, including requirements, an offer and correspondence. The work concerned the reasons for the decision and the distinction between missing documents and an offer that did not meet the requirements.

We prepared draft supplementary records and a conflict of interest document. The work included identifying the materials needed to document the decision.

We analysed whether a delivery deadline could be changed in a project subject to additional funding rules. We reviewed the amendment provisions, the stated reason for delay and the evidence needed to support it.

We worked on the draft amendment and the information to obtain before signing. The assessment connected the actual grounds for the change with its effect on the procurement terms.